Before-and-after photos in cosmetic ads: how far is okay?
Before-and-after photos are among the most powerful assets in cosmetic advertising. That also makes them easy to get wrong, so marketers ask about them constantly.
Common concerns
- Same conditions? Different lighting, angles, makeup or time of day can make it look like a photography difference, not a product effect.
- Retouching: many say a filtered or edited photo cannot count as a comparison at all.
- What is being shown: coverage from a makeup product and long-term change from skincare are different things. Skincare before-and-afters tie straight into claim rules.
- Whose photo: using a customer's review photo requires image rights and consent, plus disclosure if anything was gifted.
- Supporting data: if the photos come from a test, people often say the test conditions should be shown too.
Interpretation can vary by product type and wording, so many teams get an ad review body or expert to check borderline cases.
What internal rules does your team use for before-and-after photos? Has anyone decided to drop them entirely?
0
No comments yet. Be the first.